The Troubled Waters of the Seine: Pollution, Olympic Athletes, and Unlikely Remedies

Cover image for blog article. The text The Troubled Waters of the Seine: Pollution, Olympic Athletes, and Unlikely Remedies overlayed on an image of post-apocalyptic Paris.

As the world watches the 2024 Paris Olympics, a different kind of struggle is taking place in the heart of the French capital. The Seine River, a historic and cultural icon, has become the focal point of controversy as it hosts several Olympic events despite its troubled waters. What was once a picturesque backdrop to Parisian life has, over the decades, become a symbol of urban pollution and environmental neglect. Today, the river’s poor water quality is not just an eyesore—it’s a health hazard, particularly for the world-class athletes who are now swimming in its murky depths.

A History of Pollution

The pollution of the Seine has deep roots, dating back to the Industrial Revolution when the river became a convenient dumping ground for various forms of waste, including industrial chemicals, human sewage, and stormwater runoff. Over the years, this relentless pollution took a heavy toll on the river’s ecosystem. By the 1970s, oxygen levels in the water were so low that only three species of fish could survive, and the bacterial contamination, especially E. coli, reached dangerous levels. Parisian authorities have been aware of these issues for decades, and numerous efforts to clean up the Seine have been undertaken, but progress has been slow and inconsistent. For more, read The Seine’s Polluted Past: Industrial Revolution and Beyond.

  • Olympic swimmers navigate the Seine River, with paramedics and ambulances on standby. Coca-Cola bottles and snacks are visible on a table in the foreground.
  • Swimmers in the Seine are surrounded by paramedics in Coca-Cola-branded ambulances, with Coca-Cola bottles arranged on a table.
  • A post-apocalyptic scene along the Seine with a Coca-Cola-branded hazmat ambulance. Empty Coke bottles are scattered on a table.
  • A dystopian vision of Paris, with the Eiffel Tower looming over a polluted Seine. A decaying Coca-Cola hazmat ambulance and empty Coke bottles set the eerie scene.

The 2024 Olympics: A Catalyst for Change?

This year’s Olympics provided a significant reason for a renewed effort to clean up the Seine. In preparation for the games, the French government and the city of Paris committed to a $1.5 billion initiative aimed at making the river swimmable again. This ambitious project included overhauling the city’s aging sewer system, constructing large underground storage basins to capture rainwater, and upgrading wastewater treatment plants. The goal was not only to protect the athletes competing in the open-water swimming events and the triathlon but also to create a lasting legacy for Parisians by restoring the Seine to a state where it could be safely enjoyed by the public.

Despite these efforts, the river’s recovery has been uneven. While there have been periods when water quality tests showed the Seine to be within safe levels for swimming, these results have often been fleeting. Heavy rainfall continues to overwhelm the city’s combined sewer system, leading to the discharge of untreated wastewater directly into the river. As a result, bacterial levels, including those of E. coli, frequently spike to dangerous levels, prompting Olympic officials to delay or cancel events to protect the athletes.

The Health Risks Facing Olympians

For the athletes, swimming in the Seine is not just another challenge; it’s a gamble with their health. E. coli, a bacterium commonly found in human waste, is a particular concern. Exposure to E. coli-contaminated water can lead to a range of illnesses, from gastrointestinal distress to more severe infections. During the recent Olympic events, several athletes have reported feeling unwell after competing in the river, raising alarms about the true safety of the Seine.

In response to these risks, some athletes have resorted to a rather unconventional remedy: drinking Coca-Cola immediately after leaving the water. This practice, based on the belief that the acidity of Coke can neutralize harmful bacteria in the digestive tract, has become something of a folk remedy among open-water swimmers. While the logic behind this practice is questionable—medical experts have pointed out that the stomach’s natural acidity is far more potent than that of any soft drink—the fact that athletes feel the need to take such measures speaks volumes about the risks they perceive.

The Coca-Cola Myth and the Realities of Contaminated Water

The use of Coca-Cola as a post-race “cure” is not entirely without merit, though not for the reasons some athletes might think. While Coke won’t kill bacteria, its high sugar content can provide a quick source of energy to athletes depleted by their exertions. However, relying on sugary sodas to combat the effects of swimming in polluted water is a far cry from an ideal solution. It highlights a deeper issue: the inadequacy of the Seine’s current state to safely host Olympic events.

For those watching the Olympics from the safety of their homes, it’s easy to underestimate just how dangerous swimming in contaminated water can be. Bacteria like E. coli are invisible to the naked eye, but their effects can be devastating. From stomach cramps and diarrhea to more severe infections, the health risks are real and significant. Moreover, these risks aren’t limited to athletes. If the Seine remains unsafe, the broader goal of opening it to the public for recreational use could lead to widespread health issues in the future.

What Happens Next

The Seine River’s plight is a cautionary tale about the consequences of urban pollution and the challenges of environmental restoration. While the efforts to clean up the river for the 2024 Olympics are commendable (and costly), they haven’t been enough to fully mitigate the risks. As athletes continue to compete in these less-than-ideal conditions, it’s clear that more work is needed to ensure the Seine can truly be considered safe.

The story of the Seine is far from over. Beyond the spectacle of the Olympics, there lies the ongoing challenge of balancing urban development with environmental stewardship. The lessons learned here in Paris could very well serve as a blueprint—or a warning—for other cities facing similar issues around the world. For now, as the world watches the games unfold, the hope is that the legacy of the 2024 Olympics will be more than just medals and memories, but a safer, cleaner Seine for generations to come.

Navigating the Ethical Dilemma of AI-Powered Homelessness Prevention

AI homelessness prevention. Unhoused robots in a homelessness prediction program.

The rise of homelessness is a growing crisis facing cities across America. In Los Angeles alone, numbers have climbed 12% in recent years to over 60,000 unhoused individuals, as highlighted in this recent news article. Searching for solutions to this escalating issue, L.A. is pioneering a first-of-its-kind AI initiative that aims to predict and preempt homelessness before it occurs. But does this tech-driven approach for AI-powered homelessness prevention come at the cost of privacy and equity?

The Promising Premise of AI-Powered Prevention

With over $31 million in funding, primarily from pandemic relief aid, Los Angeles County’s “Homeless Prevention Pilot Program” utilizes an AI system that consolidates data points from seven different county agencies. This includes information on emergency room visits, substance abuse diagnoses, arrests, and more.

By scanning for indicators that could identify those at risk, the AI generates a list of potential future homeless cases. Social workers then conduct personalized outreach to offer assistance like rent subsidies, counseling, or eviction prevention before housing loss actually happens.

Proponents praise this predictive analytics approach as a forward-thinking way technology can guide tangible community support. If effective, AI-powered prevention could become a model replicated nationwide. In fact, many local governments have already contacted me asking for help to implement something similar. But many pressing ethical questions remain.

Emerging Issues Around Privacy and Equity

AI-driven initiatives aiming to address social issues often walk a fine line between innovation and overreach. While the motives behind Los Angeles’ pilot are admirable, experts urge caution around how such a system handles sensitive information and impacts vulnerable populations.

AI homelessness prevention. Unhoused robots in a homelessness prediction program.
  • Data Ownership: Whose data is it anyway? With cross-agency sharing, clarity is needed on whether individuals, agencies, or third parties own and control the information being pooled.
  • Access and Purpose: Which entities can view the consolidated data, and are proper limitations in place on its use?
  • Opt-Out Options: Can people choose not to have their personal records included in the AI system? This ability to opt-out is key.
  • Accuracy and Accountability: What recourse exists if the algorithm incorrectly flags someone as at-risk? Errors could lead to unfair profiling.

Ensuring Racial Equity in Predictive Analytics

Without careful design, AI-based social programs risk perpetuating systemic biases against marginalized groups.

  • Mitigating Historical Biases: Models based on past data trends may reflect embedded societal prejudices. Proactive steps must be taken to address this.
  • Avoiding Stereotyping: Predictive analytics should allow for nuance instead of reinforcing existing narratives about certain communities.
  • Increasing Diverse Perspectives: The teams building and deploying these AI systems must encompass inclusive viewpoints and experiences.

Balancing Innovation With Responsibility

L.A.’s pilot represents the start of a larger conversation on implementing emerging technology ethically. Solving homelessness requires addressing its complex roots like lack of affordable housing, healthcare access, and living wages.

While AI presents a compelling tool, it alone cannot remedy these systemic factors. Its role should complement, not overshadow, broader policy and social changes. Of the many proposals to address economic disparity, universal basic income shows particular promise as a scalable solution with the potential to greatly reduce poverty and homelessness. With conscientious design and community trust-building, predictive analytics can potentially guide resources to assist the unhoused, but not at the sacrifice of privacy and civil liberties.

The path forward lies in fostering an approach centered on transparency, accountability, and equity. Only then, can AI be harnessed responsibly to drive meaningful progress.